![Μπριτ Έκλαντ: Το πρώην Bond Girl που κήρυξε πόλεμο στις πλαστικές - «H Μαντόνα έγινε σαν πατάτα, η Κίντμαν μόνιμα σαστισμένη»](https://i1.prth.gr/images/360x203/files/2021-06-05/eklant.png)
![Αυξημένο ουρικό οξύ: Τι επιτρέπεται να τρώμε και τι απαγορεύεται](https://i1.prth.gr/images/488x275/files/2019-07-27/ouriko-oxi.jpg)
What part of Nicole Kidman’s already incredible body shall we over photoshop this year to convey our respect for her as an actress? pic.twitter.com/rbnIUqMv3H
— Chris Spargo (@chrisonchris) February 17, 2022
Talk to me about the @VanityFair cover that features an infantilised Nicole Kidman - why would they put an accomplished actor & strikingly beautiful 54-year-old woman in a midriff, a micro mini & school girl outfit. Am I missing something? pic.twitter.com/A9NwZTIRPL
— nicolacoop (@NicolaCoop) February 17, 2022
Even beyond the bizarre styling and weirdo creative direction… this is just straight shoddy photoshop work…duplicated flower patch clear as day, foot becoming one with the grass…unclear if she is a missing part of her hip…smh that this got signed off on by so many.. pic.twitter.com/axIu24XhkL
— Puppybrother (@puppybrother12) February 17, 2022
Airbrushing is done on the body, so she’s still airbrushed. Also, videos can be tweaked. Even still, compare the still from the video (right) to the cover (left). The cover photo is obviously distorted. pic.twitter.com/8OnYAqEjVw
— Lisa Strawn (@lparke) February 17, 2022
Why Vanity Fair decided to ruin Nicole Kidman and Penelope Cruz with all this photoshop?
— Flav⎊ (@Darveyinbed) February 17, 2022
Why the need ? 😫 pic.twitter.com/875CMluTHR